Skip to content

Conversation

@dol
Copy link
Owner

@dol dol commented Jan 6, 2025

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Luacheck Report

10 tests  ±0   10 ✅ ±0   0s ⏱️ ±0s
 1 suites ±0    0 💤 ±0 
 1 files   ±0    0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 0fd5684. ± Comparison against base commit ec4a44c.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2025

Test Results

26 tests  +4   26 ✅ +4   0s ⏱️ ±0s
 1 suites ±0    0 💤 ±0 
 1 files   ±0    0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 0fd5684. ± Comparison against base commit ec4a44c.

This pull request removes 16 and adds 20 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both.
/kong-plugin/spec/kong-authz-openfga/02-unit_spec.lua:190 ‑ kong-authz-openfga: (unit) [#basic] invalid mock response
/kong-plugin/spec/kong-authz-openfga/02-unit_spec.lua:190 ‑ kong-authz-openfga: (unit) [#basic_contextual] invalid mock response
/kong-plugin/spec/kong-authz-openfga/02-unit_spec.lua:190 ‑ kong-authz-openfga: (unit) [#basic_multiple_attempts] invalid mock response
/kong-plugin/spec/kong-authz-openfga/02-unit_spec.lua:190 ‑ kong-authz-openfga: (unit) [#sandbox] invalid mock response
/kong-plugin/spec/kong-authz-openfga/02-unit_spec.lua:197 ‑ kong-authz-openfga: (unit) [#basic] allow
/kong-plugin/spec/kong-authz-openfga/02-unit_spec.lua:197 ‑ kong-authz-openfga: (unit) [#basic_contextual] allow
/kong-plugin/spec/kong-authz-openfga/02-unit_spec.lua:197 ‑ kong-authz-openfga: (unit) [#basic_multiple_attempts] allow
/kong-plugin/spec/kong-authz-openfga/02-unit_spec.lua:197 ‑ kong-authz-openfga: (unit) [#sandbox] allow
/kong-plugin/spec/kong-authz-openfga/02-unit_spec.lua:215 ‑ kong-authz-openfga: (unit) [#basic] deny
/kong-plugin/spec/kong-authz-openfga/02-unit_spec.lua:215 ‑ kong-authz-openfga: (unit) [#basic_contextual] deny
…
/kong-plugin/spec/kong-authz-openfga/02-unit_spec.lua:193 ‑ kong-authz-openfga: (unit) [#basic] invalid mock response
/kong-plugin/spec/kong-authz-openfga/02-unit_spec.lua:193 ‑ kong-authz-openfga: (unit) [#basic_contextual] invalid mock response
/kong-plugin/spec/kong-authz-openfga/02-unit_spec.lua:193 ‑ kong-authz-openfga: (unit) [#basic_multiple_attempts] invalid mock response
/kong-plugin/spec/kong-authz-openfga/02-unit_spec.lua:193 ‑ kong-authz-openfga: (unit) [#sandbox] invalid mock response
/kong-plugin/spec/kong-authz-openfga/02-unit_spec.lua:200 ‑ kong-authz-openfga: (unit) [#basic] allow
/kong-plugin/spec/kong-authz-openfga/02-unit_spec.lua:200 ‑ kong-authz-openfga: (unit) [#basic_contextual] allow
/kong-plugin/spec/kong-authz-openfga/02-unit_spec.lua:200 ‑ kong-authz-openfga: (unit) [#basic_multiple_attempts] allow
/kong-plugin/spec/kong-authz-openfga/02-unit_spec.lua:200 ‑ kong-authz-openfga: (unit) [#sandbox] allow
/kong-plugin/spec/kong-authz-openfga/02-unit_spec.lua:218 ‑ kong-authz-openfga: (unit) [#basic] deny
/kong-plugin/spec/kong-authz-openfga/02-unit_spec.lua:218 ‑ kong-authz-openfga: (unit) [#basic_contextual] deny
…

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 6, 2025

LCOV of commit 0fd5684 during Test #52

Summary coverage rate:
  lines......: 65.7% (92 of 140 lines)
  functions..: no data found
  branches...: no data found

Files changed coverage rate:
                                             |Lines       |Functions  |Branches    
  Filename                                   |Rate     Num|Rate    Num|Rate     Num
  =================================================================================
  kong/plugins/kong-authz-openfga/access.lua | 0.0%     19|    -     0|    -      0

@dol dol force-pushed the build/smoketest-release-support branch 2 times, most recently from 8517d4b to 21c8578 Compare January 6, 2025 18:58
@dol dol force-pushed the build/smoketest-release-support branch from 21c8578 to 0fd5684 Compare January 6, 2025 19:12
@dol dol merged commit e9ed4ae into main Jan 6, 2025
10 checks passed
@dol dol deleted the build/smoketest-release-support branch February 13, 2025 15:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants